As the presidential plane, Air Force One is one of the main air transports for the U.S., alongside the Nightwatch, which is designed for emergencies. The iconic Air Force One is essentially a flying fortress, but it’s time for an upgrade. According to reports, President Donald Trump is set to receive its replacement “for free.”

The Qatari royal family is reportedly set to provide the new aircraft. Trump hasn’t denied the news, which has ignited a heated debate in American politics, even among those who typically support the president.

An update was needed. The current presidential aircraft, a Boeing VC-25, has been in service for an impressive 35 years. Although planes usually have a long service life, the maintenance costs for this aircraft were becoming impractical. In January 2015, the Air Force announced plans for a replacement, selecting a Boeing 747-8 as the new Air Force One.

Officially designated as VC-25B, the Air Force made a deal with Boeing to purchase two 747-8 jets that were initially intended for a Russian airline but were never delivered. This decision has resulted in cost savings on the initial purchase. More importantly, it’s also streamlined the process of retrofitting the planes with the necessary equipment and security features, as well as constructing an appropriate hangar for them.

The current Air Force One.

Trump said no. In December 2016, before assuming the presidency, Trump expressed his dissatisfaction with the costs associated with the Air Force One program. “Boeing is building a brand new 747 Air Force One for future presidents, but costs are out of control, more than $4 billion. Cancel order!” he shared on social media.

The Boeing 747-8 features significant technological and aerodynamic improvements and is one of the world’s longest passenger aircraft. Additionally, being manufactured in the U.S., it was a natural choice for the new presidential aircraft. Although it was initially estimated to enter service in 2024, several delays and issues have extended the timeline to at least 2027.

This is when Qatar’s royal family enters the scene.

More from Xataka On

Xi Jinping Has His Own Version of Air Force One. This Is How China Outpaced the U.S. With Its Presidential Aircraft

A royal gift. Trump is embarking on a series of state trips. As in his previous term, his first destination will be Saudi Arabia, followed by Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. This itinerary makes sense due to shared interests in economics and geopolitics. These Middle East countries invest billions in U.S. armaments, while U.S. bases in the region are crucial for maintaining influence in Asia. Beyond these deals, Trump may also return with a new presidential plane.

According to NBC, Trump will receive a luxurious Boeing 747-8 as a gift from the Qatari royal family. A White House official confirmed that Qatar has proposed donating a plane to the Defense Department. However, this won’t be accepted during the president’s visit.

The Qatari press department provided additional details: “The possible transfer of an aircraft for temporary use as Air Force One is currently under consideration between Qatar’s Ministry of Defense and the U.S. Department of Defense, but the matter remains under review by the respective legal departments, and no decision has been made.”

Reactions. The U.S. political arena has reacted quickly to this decision. Democratic representatives have criticized it, calling for investigations into what they describe as a “flying grift” and “the most valuable gift ever conferred on a President by a foreign government.”

The aircraft in question is valued at around $300 to $400 million. Some have responded with sarcasm, including Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY). “Nothing says ‘America First’ like Air Force One, brought to you by Qatar. It’s not just bribery, it’s premium foreign influence with extra legroom,” he shared on his X account.

Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) has taken a stronger stance, labeling the move as “farcically corrupt” and “blatantly unconstitutional.”

Not bribery. Critics argue that this situation needs to be presented to and approved by Congress, as outlined in the emoluments clause of the Constitution. This clause prohibits the president and other federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval. However, the nuance here is that this wouldn’t be a gift to Trump personally but rather to the Department of Defense.

Speaking anonymously to NBC, a former Justice Department official pointed out that “bribery requires a corrupt intent to influence an official act.” If this kind of intent is present, then the gift would violate federal law.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that “any gift given by a foreign government is always accepted in full compliance with all applicable laws.” She added, “President Trump’s administration is committed to full transparency.”

Trump himself addressed the matter on his social media platform, Truth, referring to Qatar’s 747-8 as a temporary replacement for Air Force One.

Click on the image to view the original post on Truth.

After the term. White House lawyers told ABC News that it’s “legally permissible” to accept the donation of the plane based on the fine print of the agreement. According to this agreement, the Qatari government will donate the plane to the Department of Defense for use as Air Force One. However, before the end of the president’s term in 2029, the plane is set to be donated again to Trump’s presidential library.

This arrangement would allow Trump to continue using the plane as a private aircraft after leaving office. This plan has sparked controversy, with organizations advocating for accountability and ethics in Washington expressing their outrage.

“It is ridiculous. It’s a gift to Trump. The federal government is a pass-through,” government ethics expert Kathleen Clark told CNN. Even far-right activist Laura Loomer has criticized the idea in her own way, saying, “We cannot accept a $400 million ‘gift’ from jihadists in suits.”

Click on the image to view the original post on X.

A “security nightmare.” Although it’s not official yet, there’s considerable buzz surrounding Qatar’s potential gift. Law enforcement sources told CNN that if this move takes place, it’ll be a “security nightmare.” The Air Force will need to dismantle the aircraft to inspect it for surveillance equipment and ensure that no items could compromise its integrity.

Additionally, modifications would be needed for presidential use. “It takes a great deal of work to have encrypted communications and manage the military and federal government from anywhere around the world in any circumstance,” Richard Aboulafia, managing director at aerospace consulting firm AeroDynamic Advisory, told CNN.

Former defense officials highlighted to AP News that Air Force One aircraft are heavily modified. Although the Qatari plane will have secure communications and classified elements, it’ll be more limited than a purpose-built aircraft.

In other words, the plane that the Qatari royal family intends to donate would be in good condition, but the Air Force would have to make extensive changes. This includes armoring it, installing its communication systems, and checking for any potential security breaches.

Image | Jan Rosolino

Related | Boeing’s Had a Rough Few Years. The Air Force Just Gave It a Prime Opportunity to Recover: The New F-47 Contract

Can you imagine spending the rest of your life inside an airplane? Not flying or traveling from one destination to another, but truly living in it day after day, just like a real home. This was the aspiration of Bruce Campbell, a retired electrical engineer who now resides in a Boeing 727 located in a forest outside Portland.

A commercial airliner is typically dismantled at the end of its useful life. The most valuable components, such as engines, avionics systems, and landing gear, are usually salvaged. However, the airframe is often left to sit for years in one of the world’s aircraft graveyards, even though recycling initiatives for aluminum and titanium parts exist.

Campbell wasn’t satisfied with the idea that the complex and sophisticated structures of commercial aircraft would end up scrapped and forgotten in a remote desert corner. He believed that if planes could no longer fly, they could still serve a useful purpose as living spaces. With this vision in mind, he purchased the fuselage of a retired airliner, including several internal components, in 1999. According to USA Today, he paid $100,000 (about $190,000 today) for the entire aircraft.

More from Xataka On

This Is Silver Bullet, an Ultra-Secure Aircraft Pod That the Air Force Often Uses Instead of the ‘Doomsday Plane’

A Boeing 757 Converted into a Home

Purchasing the plane was just the beginning. The next challenge was moving it to its new location. To do this, the aircraft had to be partially disassembled and transported by truck to Campbell’s farm outside Portland. Once there, he reassembled piece by piece among the trees and vegetation. Today, the plane rests on a support structure that connects to the landing gear and wings.

Campbell retained much of the aircraft’s original design, including seats and overhead compartments. Visitors enter through one of the emergency doors and walk down the central aisle. The inhabited space is filled with everyday objects: a microwave, a table, and a refrigerator. There are also several computers, including an Apple Macintosh SE from the late 1980s. Visitors can use it to leave a message.

One of the most striking areas is the cockpit, where several of the original controls are still preserved. The thrust levers, yoke, and much of the instrument panel remain intact, almost as if the plane were ready to take off. The wiring and electrical systems are completely exposed elsewhere in the interior, reflecting Campbell’s background as an electrical engineer.

Far from keeping his unique home as a personal retreat, Campbell has been welcoming visitors for more than two decades. For those who approach with curiosity, he offers a short tour of the airplane-turned-home, sharing his vision and lifestyle.

Notably, the airplane Campbell bought is a Boeing 727, a narrow-body aircraft produced from 1962 to 1984. It was widely used for domestic and medium-range international routes, with a range of up to 2,900 miles in its most advanced versions. Boeing 727 became one of the most popular models of its time, with more than 1,800 units produced. However, many were retired in the 1990s because airlines began to replace them with more efficient models.

Images | AirplaneHome/Bruce Campbell

Related | U.S. Denies to Put a Kill Switch in Its F-35 Fighter Jets to Avoid Losing a Fortune. There’s a Bigger Issue at Play: Controlling the ‘Blue Line’

Amid an unprecedented trade war, experts are trying to understand how far it might escalate. The Trump administration’s actions have been both drastic and unpredictable. Within just a week, it shifted from imposing reciprocal tariffs on both allies and enemies to pausing levies to initiate negotiations.

The 90-day tariff pause gives the global economy, which was already feeling the pressure from the escalating trade tensions, a temporary relief. However, the situation with China is different. President Donald Trump offers no respite and has increased tariffs on Chinese exports to the U.S. Given this new landscape, an important question arises: Which sectors are most affected?

In the tech sector, Apple has taken action to mitigate the tariffs’ impact by shipping thousands of iPhones from India to the U.S. Additionally, Trump’s trade war might lead to price increases for the device in some markets.

Another key player in the current landscape is Boeing. It’s faced significant challenges in recent years, particularly due to two Boeing 737 Max 8 crashes. However, Boeing remains a prominent industrial leader in the U.S. As a heavyweight in the aerospace sector, its aircraft are crucial for global transportation and serve as a testament to the country’s technological and economic prowess.

However, the ongoing trade war threatens to undermine some of Boeing’s competitiveness and may offer an advantage to its major European rival, Airbus.

To better understand the current situation, we need to take a look at the tariffs imposed by the U.S. and China since Trump’s return to office:

U.S. Tariffs on Chinese Products

• Feb. 1, 2025: 10% tariffs imposed to address “the flow of contraband drugs like fentanyl to the United States.”
• March 3, 2025: 10% tariff for China’s inaction to “blunt the sustained influx of synthetic opioids.”
• April 2, 2025: 34% “reciprocal tariffs” are imposed.
• April 8, 2025: Additional 50% as retaliatory tariffs.
• April 9, 2025: Additional 41% as retaliatory tariffs.

The total amounts to 145% on imports from China.

Notably, additional tariffs have been imposed over time:

• July 10, 2018 (during Trump’s first term): A 25% tariff on certain products in response to “unfair Chinese practices.”
• Feb. 11, 2025: 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports (this goes beyond China).

Chinese Tariffs on U.S. Products

• April 4, 2025: 34% tariffs in response to U.S. “reciprocal tariffs” on all imported U.S. goods.
• April 8, 2025: 50% tariffs in response to increased U.S. “reciprocal tariffs” on all imported U.S. goods.

The total amounts to an 84% tariff on U.S. products.

Tariffs Will Increase Aircraft Manufacturing Costs

The tariffs could have a substantial impact on supply chains in the aviation industry. While the majority of Boeing’s production takes place in the U.S., many components and materials it relies on come from suppliers around the globe.

For instance, Chinese companies like Shandong Nanshan Aluminum supply aluminum to aerospace entities. One example is Spirit AeroSystems, which is based in Wichita, Kansas, and produces fuselage sections for both Airbus and Boeing. In fact, it manufactures more than 70% of the Boeing 737 airframe. In this context, tariffs could lead to an increase in the cost of aluminum imported from China.

Both Boeing and Airbus started diversifying their supply chains following the initial tariff disputes during Trump’s first term. However, recent analyses and official public documents indicate that Chinese aluminum is still used in the manufacturing of certain parts. This raises the possibility of price hikes.

The situation with Airbus illustrates how interconnected supply chains can be. Spirit AeroSystems not only partners with Boeing but also works with its major European competitor. Additionally, Boeing imports high-tech components produced in Sheffield in the United Kingdom, further highlighting the complexity of international supply relationships.

More from Xataka On

Boeing’s Had a Rough Few Years. The Air Force Just Gave It a Prime Opportunity to Recover: The New F-47 Contract

Airbus’ Tactical Advantage

From a supply chain perspective, the manufacturer most reliant on raw materials and components impacted by tariffs will likely face the greatest disadvantage. Determining which of the two major manufacturers is at a higher risk based on available data isn’t easy. However, aluminum can serve as a reference point. The manufacturer that successfully imports aluminum at the best price and with the lowest tariff burden will gain a competitive edge.

Changing suppliers involves logistical and operational adjustments, and the global context is so volatile that making structural decisions is difficult. China isn’t the only nation that faces tariffs. Many countries are still subject to a 10% base levy, despite the White House granting a 90-day extension on the strictest tariffs.

Where does Airbus’ alleged advantage lie? Reuters reports that the European manufacturer could benefit in the Chinese market due to the absence of the 84% tariffs imposed on U.S. aircraft. Although China promotes its own models, like the Comac C919, it remains one of the world’s largest buyers of aircraft. Both Airbus and Boeing have pending deliveries.

Chinese airlines may turn to Airbus if its planes are offered at lower prices than Boeing. Boeing could attempt to mitigate some of the impact by reducing its profit margins. However, the current tariffs and the possibility of future increases make that strategy unsustainable. Meanwhile, Airbus could face a significant challenge in scaling up its production capacity and meeting delivery deadlines.

Images | Daniel Eledut | Sven Piper | Lukas Souza

Related | There’s One Clear Winner From the 25% Car Tariffs: BYD, the Epitome of Everything China Has to Gain

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams returned home after a nine-month extended mission on the International Space Station (ISS). Since then, they’ve largely stayed away from the political controversies surrounding the mission. However, in a recent interview with Ars Technica, Wilmore revealed that the Starliner spacecraft’s failure was wilder than previously reported.

Pre-launch delays. Everything was ready for the Starliner spacecraft’s launch in early May. Wilmore and Williams had begun their quarantine–a standard procedure to minimize the risk of spreading viruses or infectious diseases to other crewmembers on the ISS.

However, a valve issue with the Atlas V rocket’s Centaur stage and a helium leak on the Starliner itself delayed the launch for several weeks. Concerned that his skills were becoming outdated, Wilmore requested to return to Houston to continue practicing in the simulator. Finally, astronauts were able to lift off on June 5, 2024.

It’s cold aboard the spacecraft. The launch of Starliner was smooth and remarkably precise, even more so than NASA astronauts had anticipated. It didn’t require the typical trajectory corrections they had practiced in simulators or had experienced during past missions.

However, Wilmore and Williams faced an unexpected challenge: The cabin temperature was uncomfortably cold. Designed to accommodate four astronauts (or up to seven for non-NASA missions), the cabin temperature dropped below 50 degrees Fahrenheit, causing both astronauts to sleep in their spacesuits for warmth.

Loss of thrusters. Issues that would impact the mission began to arise on the second day. While approaching the ISS autonomously, Starliner started losing thrusters.

Boeing’s spacecraft is equipped with 28 jet thrusters, which are used for maneuvering in orbit. These thrusters are positioned facing backward, forward, and in three radial directions. They help control the spacecraft’s position and orientation, enabling it to dock safely with an ISS port and deorbit as it returns to its landing site.

A tense approach to the ISS. During an unmanned test in May 2022, thrusters experienced some performance issues. Wilmore was concerned that these problems might resurface, and that’s exactly what happened.

As the spacecraft made its final approach to the ISS, it lost two thrusters, prompting Wilmore to take manual control to maintain the correct trajectory. Unfortunately, the situation worsened when the spacecraft lost a third and, shortly after that, a fourth. With the loss of all four thrusters, the spacecraft was no longer able to move in one of the necessary directions for the approach.

A decision against protocol. Official procedures dictated that, at this point, they should abort the approach to the ISS and return to Earth. Continuing the docking attempt was deemed too risky for them, the ISS crew, and the $100 billion orbital laboratory.

However, Wilmore and Williams felt that turning back amid so many failures would also be dangerous. “I don’t know that we can come back to Earth at that point. I don’t know if we can. And matter of fact, I’m thinking we probably can’t,” Wilmore said in an interview.

To make matters worse, NASA astronauts found themselves below the ISS, traveling faster than the station and drifting away from it. Despite the protocol, flight director Ed Van Cise decided to proceed with the docking maneuver.

More from Xataka On

Being an Astronaut Isn’t About Money. Here’s How Much NASA Pays for Overtime in Space

Heroes. “These people are heroes… Heroes put their tank on and they run into a fiery building and pull people out of it… Heroes also sit in their cubicle for decades studying their systems, and knowing their systems front and back,” Wilmore told Ars Technica.

He added, “When there is no time to assess a situation and go and talk to people and ask, ‘What do you think?’ they know their system so well they come up with a plan on the fly. That is a hero. And there are several of them in [NASA’s] Mission Control.”

Have you tried turning it off and on again? Van Cise informed Wilmore of the plan. The NASA astronaut released the controls, and shortly after, mission controllers sent a command to the Starliner to reboot its systems.

Turning the spacecraft off and on worked. Astronauts were able to regain control of the thrusters, although a fifth thruster failed permanently and was never recovered. With the assistance of the Mission Control Center, the spacecraft managed to return to autonomous mode and dock with the ISS.

NASA’s decision. Had Wilmore lost the fifth thruster while manually navigating with four fewer, the spacecraft would have been without the redundant maneuvering capability needed to control its reentry. That would’ve been catastrophic.

Boeing cooperated with the investigation in the following months and expressed confidence in Starliner. However, the decision to have the spacecraft return empty while the two crewmembers remained on the ISS until the next astronaut rotation makes a lot of sense now.

Starliner’s future. The spacecraft remains uncertified for manned flights to the ISS. Boeing has incurred a loss of $1.6 billion on its development. However, NASA has contracted for six flights and intends to certify it for operational trips to the space station next year.

While new seals appear to have resolved helium leaks, propulsion failures remain unresolved. As such, NASA and Boeing engineers will conduct a series of extensive tests at the agency’s White Sands facility in New Mexico to validate possible modifications. These include thermal barriers and changes to propulsion pulses.

According to NASA, the next flight of the Starliner spacecraft to the ISS won’t occur until late this year or early next year. A new flight demonstration is necessary because Boeing was unable to recover the service module containing the problematic thrusters.

By design, like Crew Dragon and other spacecraft, the service module isn’t intended for reentry and detaches from the spacecraft before returning to Earth. Boeing believes the thrusters failed due to corrosion formation and moisture buildup. The company also blames its manufacturer, Aerojet Rocketdyne. Unfortunately, evidence was destroyed upon reentry into the atmosphere shortly after the spacecraft’s return.

Images | NASA

Related | A Lifetime in 300 Days: Once-Stranded Astronauts Look Incredibly Different From How They Did Before Getting Stuck in Space

Boeing is currently facing one of the most challenging periods in its recent history. Over the years, the aerospace giant’s reputation has been tarnished by a series of operational and financial issues. Its commercial aviation division, which is responsible for developing and manufacturing aircraft such as the Boeing 737 MAX, has been particularly affected. The 2018 and 2019 crashes marked a significant turning point. New concerns, including production delays and strikes at its facilities, have compounded the situation.

The company’s defense and space division has also encountered significant setbacks. Issues with the Starliner spacecraft have exposed the program’s technical challenges and resulted in public embarrassment for the company. Additionally, other unprofitable projects have strained resources, worsening the crisis.

Amid this challenging landscape, Boeing has received a new opportunity to regain its esteemed reputation: the contract to develop the F-47.

A Turning Point for the U.S. (and Boeing)

The Air Force describes the F-47 as America’s first sixth-generation fighter, marking it as a groundbreaking project. The F-47 is part of the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, designed to replace the F-22 Raptor with stealth, communication, and firepower advancements. Moreover, the F-47 is intended to operate in conjunction with the Pentagon’s forthcoming fleet of drones, known as Collaborative Combat Aircraft. These operations aim to elevate unmanned missions to a new level.

Details about the project have been limited so far. However, budget figures released in 2024 indicate that the Air Force plans to invest up to $20 billion in NGAD research and development through 2029. Yet, all signs suggest that this amount may only be the starting point. Given that the F-35, developed by Lockheed Martin, is the most expensive fighter jet in history, it’s reasonable to assume that the new sixth-generation fighter will require an even greater investment over its lifetime.

The F-47 isn’t a sudden development from the Trump administration. Rather, it’s an initiative that has been quietly evolving for some time. The NGAD fighter aircraft program began from earlier concepts, specifically what was originally labeled as a Penetrating Counter-Air platform in the mid-2010s. Unlike other military projects, the Air Force has opted to maintain a low profile regarding this initiative.

More from Xataka On

U.S. Denies to Put a Kill Switch in Its F-35 Fighter Jets to Avoid Losing a Fortune. There’s a Bigger Issue at Play: Controlling the ‘Blue Line’

Major U.S. defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman, participated in the bidding process. However, Northrop withdrew from the competition in 2023, leaving Boeing and Lockheed as the final contenders. Recently, it was officially announced that Boeing emerged as the winner of the contract.

This is particularly significant because Lockheed was responsible for developing the F-22 Raptor, the fighter aircraft that the F-47 is intended to replace. Additionally, Boeing has a strong legacy in military aircraft, with successful models such as the F-15, F/A-18, and EA-18, originally developed by McDonnell Douglas.

While details about the F-47’s tech specs remain limited, a congressional report has underscored the urgent need for a sixth-generation fighter. This will ensure air superiority in light of China’s military advancements, which include the J-20 and J-35. The Asian country also has plans for even more advanced models underway. As such, the new F-47 aircraft must excel in weapons systems and possess enhanced range. This is crucial for operations in the Pacific Ocean, where the F-22 Raptor has shown limitations.

Images | Air Force

Related | Boeing’s Latest Product Isn’t a Plane. It’s Called the GLSDB, an Improved Bomb On Its Way to Ukraine

The image of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams finally returning to Earth will likely be one of the defining snapshots of 2025. Their eventful journey in space, marked by multiple leaks and failures aboard Boeing’s Starliner, will be long remembered. If you’re wondering whether being an astronaut is worth it after such an ordeal, the answer lies in the “bonus” they’ll receive for their overtime in orbit.

But it’s not about the money.

An extended stay. Astronauts Williams and Wilmore returned to Earth after spending nine months in space—far longer than planned. Their mission aboard Boeing’s Starliner began in June 2024 and was supposed to last just over a week. However, a malfunction in the capsule’s engines prevented it from docking properly with the International Space Station (ISS), stranding the astronauts in orbit until NASA resolved the technical issues.

The delay sparked widespread anxiety on social media, with many speculating about the astronauts’ safety and well-being. However, Williams and Wilmore remained steadfast in their commitment to the mission. They rejected claims that they were “stranded” or “trapped.” As Wilmore clarified, such unforeseen events are part of the job, and they were prepared for them.

Economic sacrifice. Despite the extreme challenges they faced, NASA astronauts receive no additional compensation for the dangers of their missions or the long hours they spend in space. According to current NASA rates, Williams and Wilmore earn an annual salary of $152,258. However, this salary doesn’t include overtime pay, holiday pay, and hazard pay—a stark contrast to many high-paying professions on Earth.

Former NASA astronaut Mike Massimino explained, “[There’s] no hazard pay, there’s no overtime, there’s no comp time.” This means that despite spending nine months in orbit instead of one week, astronauts receive no extra pay. The closest thing to “extra” compensation they get is a small daily stipend of $5 for being in space—a modest and almost symbolic amount, totaling just $1,430 for the 286 days they spent on the ISS.

What NASA says. NASA emphasizes that astronauts have all their expenses covered, including transportation, lodging, and food during their stay on the ISS. Still, compared to other high-paying jobs that don’t involve physical risk, astronaut pay may seem disproportionate, especially considering the dangers they face.

More from Xataka On

A Child Once Asked Astronauts, ‘Why Doesn’t the Sun Make Outer Space Bright?’ It’s a Good Question

It’s not about money. While other professions with similar salaries, such as bank tellers or notaries, allow employees to work in comfortable environments without mortal danger, space exploration involves isolation, uncertainty, and constant risk. Yet many astronauts choose this career. The key seems clear: They do it out of passion for space and exploration, not for financial gain.

For many, becoming an astronaut remains a childhood dream. A 2019 study by Lego found that more than 10% of children in the U.S. and the UK still aspire to be astronauts, despite the rise of new careers like digital content creation. For Williams and Wilmore, the chance to contribute to space exploration and scientific research surely outweighs any financial sacrifice.

They weren’t just waiting—they were on a mission. During their extended stay, Williams and Wilmore didn’t just wait to return home. They actively contributed to the ISS’s maintenance and upgrades. Over nine months, their tasks included inspecting and repairing hardware, organizing cargo and supplies, supporting science experiments and technology demonstrations, configuring a new airlock system, and testing physical activity in microgravity.

In short, their time in orbit advanced NASA’s scientific knowledge and helped maintain the ISS as a critical hub for space exploration.

Endurance and dedication. For many, the idea of being stranded in space might seem like an unimaginable nightmare. But for astronauts like Williams and Wilmore, it’s just part of the job. According to Ken Bowersox, NASA’s chief of space operations, astronauts are trained to focus not on when they’ll return but on the success of the mission.

Perhaps, beyond the money they earn, this story serves as a reminder that in space exploration, motivation and resilience are as important as technology.

Image | NASA

Related | Astronauts Have Been Growing Lettuce in Space for Years. A New Study Says These Vegetables Could Make Them Sick

On Tuesday, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams returned to Earth after nine months on the International Space Station. This isn’t an unusually long duration for astronauts–some Russian crews have spent three times as long in orbit. However, Wilmore and Williams’ mission was initially meant to last just over a week. What followed became one of NASA’s most controversial decisions in recent years.

Express Rotation

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump have used the situation to criticize NASA. However, regardless of what they say, the two astronauts weren’t marooned. Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft transported them to the ISS in June and returned empty to Earth due to a thruster problems. This issue caused NASA managers to lose confidence in the safety of returning their astronauts.

Wilmore and Williams were initially reassigned to SpaceX’s Crew-8 mission. Had an emergency occurred on the ISS between August and September, they would’ve returned on that spacecraft, seated under the other four crew members without the proper suits. In September, Crew-9 arrived at the ISS with two vacant seats and two suits for both astronauts, meaning their situation was regularized.

Since then, Wilmore and Williams had a clear return plan. As soon as the four replacement astronauts from SpaceX’s Crew-10 mission arrived, they would return to Earth alongside their two Crew-9 mission mates. There were some delays caused by technical issues. For instance, the original Crew Dragon spacecraft assigned to Crew-10 wasn’t ready and had to be replaced. However, political pressures ultimately expedited the process.

Crew-10 arrived at the ISS in the early hours of Monday morning. 24 hours later, the Crew-9 mission undocked to reenter the atmosphere and return to Earth. Astronauts typically spend more time together catching up on life aboard the orbiting station, but this time it was a quick rotation.

More from Xataka On

Elon Musk Shuts Down Design Flaw Rumors in the New Starship, Says It’s Going to Mars Next Year

The Return Flight

Clad in their SpaceX suits, Wilmore and Williams said goodbye to their crewmates. Then, they entered the Crew Dragon spacecraft alongside NASA’s Nick Hague and Roscosmos’ Aleksandr Gorbunov, the other two crew members of the Crew-9 mission.

The SpaceX spacecraft autonomously undocked from the ISS and sped away using its thrusters. Over the next 17 hours, Crew Dragon maneuvered to reduce its altitude.

The most delicate maneuver occurred 12 minutes before splashdown. The spacecraft detached from its service module and fired its engines to initiate deorbit. It then began its atmospheric reentry. It became surrounded by plasma and temporarily lost communication due to the high speeds at which it passed through the atmospheric gases.

When it reached an altitude of 18,000 feet, two pilot parachutes deployed to slow the spacecraft, followed by four main parachutes at 6,400 feet to cushion the splashdown. The Dragon spacecraft touched down in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Tallahassee at a speed of 25 feet per second, shedding its parachutes. At 5:57 p.m. ET / 2:57 p.m. PT, Wilmore and Williams returned home after nine months of scientific work and ISS maintenance. The mission had come to a close.

Images | NASA

Related | Elon Musk Isn’t Just Influencing NASA. He’s Starting to Dominate It

After nine months orbiting Earth due to issues with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft, NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams are finally preparing to return home aboard a SpaceX-operated spacecraft.

In late August, NASA decided that the two astronauts would remain on the International Space Station until the next crew rotation in early 2025. However, despite everything going according to plan, their return has been overshadowed by political controversies.

Context. Wilmore and Williams were launched into space in June 2024 as part of a test mission for the Starliner spacecraft. Boeing and NASA were hoping to utilize it for regular astronaut transport to the ISS, similar to what SpaceX has been doing since 2020.

Originally, the mission was expected to last only 10 days. Unfortunately, helium leaks and propulsion failures in Starliner compelled the astronauts to extend their stay until NASA decided the spacecraft would return empty. Meanwhile, Wilmore and Williams remained on the ISS, pending the arrival of SpaceX’s Crew-9 mission.

After nine months of conducting microgravity experiments and performing maintenance spacewalks, the two stranded astronauts now have a return date set for March 19. This will occur a few days after the Crew-10 team, scheduled to launch on March 12, arrives at the station.

Controversy. NASA’s decision seemed primarily technical at first. The agency prioritized the safety of its astronauts by requiring Boeing to deorbit Starliner without any crew aboard. Meanwhile, the Crew-9 mission was launched with two empty seats to ensure the safe return of astronauts stranded on the ISS.

However, there’s an alternative narrative. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk recently claimed that the decision wasn’t based on technicalities but rather on political motives. He added that the Biden administration was solely responsible for the decision, reportedly made even before President Donald Trump took office again. Musk offered to send an additional Crew Dragon spacecraft to quickly rescue the astronauts, but he said that the White House declined his offer.

The controversy intensified due to accusations from both Musk and Trump in several interviews. Tensions escalated even further when European astronaut Andreas Mogensen publicly accused Musk of lying. This prompted an aggressive response from the SpaceX founder, who called Mogensen “fully retarded.”

More from Xataka On

Elon Musk Has a New Piece of Advice for President Trump: Deorbit the ISS Within Two Years

Plot twist. Although NASA refuted Musk’s statements, Wilmore and his family have presented another possibility: that Musk may be right. In a recent press conference from the ISS, the astronaut gave credibility to Musk’s claims. “I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual,” Wilmore said. However, he also clarified that he didn’t know the exact details of the decision-making process.

Adding fuel to the fire, his daughter Daryn posted a video on social media expressing her frustration with the situation. She said, “There’s a lot of politics, there’s a lot of things that I’m not at liberty to say, and that I don’t know fully about. But there’s been issues. There’s been negligence. And that’s the reason why this has just kept getting delayed. There’s just been issue after issue after issue.”

What NASA says. Senior NASA officials, such as Ken Bowersox and Steve Stich, reiterated that the astronauts’ extended stay was motivated solely by technical and operational reasons related to the safety and logistics of the ISS.

They admitted that SpaceX offered alternatives to the official plan in 2024. However, these alternatives were rejected not for political reasons but due to budgetary and technical considerations that prioritized the ISS’s operational continuity.

NASA recently published a summary of all that Wilmore and Williams have accomplished during their nine months on the Crew-9 mission. This includes more than 900 hours dedicated to key scientific research on biomanufacturing, space agriculture, advanced exercise systems, and studies on microorganisms in microgravity.

Image | NASA

Related | Jared Isaacman Isn’t in Charge of NASA Yet. However, He’s Seen as a Key Factor to Boeing’s Downfall

A few weeks ago, the two astronauts stranded in space after their June 5 launch aboard the Starliner spacecraft to the International Space Station (ISS) received good news: Their return to Earth will be sooner than expected. For Boeing, however, the mission fiasco is far from over. The company is trying to sell off its struggling space division for parts. The latest twist: China appears to have turned the Starliner’s biggest problem into an advantage.

Boeing’s problem as inspiration. In a surprising technological development, Chinese scientists have transformed NASA’s—and especially Boeing’s—severe crisis into a potential revolution in aerospace propulsion. The Starliner capsule suffered multiple helium leaks that shut down its propulsion systems, stranding the two astronauts aboard the ISS.

The incident turned helium, an ultralight gas traditionally used to pressurize liquid propellants, into a symbol of technological vulnerability. Chinese researchers saw that same vulnerability as an opportunity to develop a technology that could transform the military and space industries.

Helium-powered solid propulsion. A recent study published in the journal Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica details how a team led by Yang Zenan of Harbin Engineering University demonstrated that controlled helium injection can significantly enhance the performance of solid-fuel rocket engines.

Specifically, the researchers found that introducing helium through microscopic pores (about 2 mm) in the combustion chamber increased the engine’s specific efficiency by 5.77%. By fine-tuning the helium-to-combustion gas ratio (one part helium to four parts fuel gas), the scientists were able to instantly triple the engine's thrust from 100% to 313%, depending on operational requirements.

Thermal camouflage and invisibility. The use of helium isn’t limited to improving power or thrust. One of its most strategic advantages is the drastic reduction in exhaust temperature. As an extremely light gas—with a molar mass of only 4 g/mol compared to 29 g/mol for typical combustion gases—helium expands and cools the exhaust stream, reducing its temperature by up to 34.38 degrees Fahrenheit.

This temperature reduction significantly lowers the infrared signature of rockets powered by this technology, making them nearly undetectable by the infrared sensors used in modern military satellites such as SpaceX’s Starshield and interceptor systems such as the SM-3 Block IIA.

More from Xataka On

China Identifies a Strategic Advantage to Win the Aircraft Carrier Race Against the U.S.: A ‘Bubble’ in Its Defense

Improved stability and safety. Another key advantage of helium, highlighted by the researchers, is its chemically inert nature, which avoids the combustion instability associated with other light gases, especially hydrogen. This ensures smooth, predictable flight, reducing operational risks that have traditionally hindered volatile alternative technologies.

Additionally, by absorbing excess heat generated during combustion, helium helps lower exhaust temperatures and protect internal engine materials. This extends engine life and enhances overall safety.

Military and strategic applications. The researchers say the technology has profound military and strategic implications. The ability to rapidly modulate missile thrust in flight allows for unpredictable attack trajectories, significantly improving maneuverability. This aspect is particularly relevant for advanced defensive systems, as the combination of reduced infrared detectability and variable acceleration makes interception far more difficult—especially against hypersonic missiles.

According to the researchers, this innovation could directly address challenges in speed, range, and thermal stealth that pose difficulties for U.S.-developed missile defense systems.

Civilian applications and space potential. The benefits of this technology extend beyond military use. The research team suggests it could revolutionize civilian and commercial spaceflight, particularly in the rapid, cost-effective launch of satellites using solid-fuel rockets.

This capability would be particularly valuable for urgent commercial, scientific, and humanitarian missions, providing a flexible and cost-effective alternative to today’s expensive launch systems.

Context and relevance. NASA recently announced that astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, affected by the Starliner malfunction, will finally return to Earth in mid-March aboard a SpaceX spacecraft. Steve Stich, NASA’s Commercial Crew Program manager, said the incident demonstrated once again that “human spaceflight is full of unexpected challenges.”

Ironically, the same issue that caused major setbacks for NASA and Boeing has helped Chinese scientists achieve a potentially disruptive innovation—one that could soon redefine the technological and strategic landscape.

Image | NASA Kennedy | Arthur Wang (Unsplash)

Related | China Has an Ambitious Plan to Surpass the West in Technology. These Are the 18 Companies It’s Selected to Carry It Out

The E-4B Nightwatch, commonly referred to as the “Doomsday plane,” is a crucial component of the National Military Command System. It’s a modified Boeing 747-200, similar to the presidential aircraft. The E-4B is equipped with conference rooms and advanced communication systems. These are essential for executing emergency orders and coordinating armed forces if ground command and control centers become inoperative.

Additionally, the Secretary of Defense frequently uses the E-4 B during international trips. As such, connectivity and command capability are ensured in alignment with the organization of the armed forces. But what happens if no E-4B is available? An alternative plan is in place.

If the E-4B Can’t Fly, the C-17 Is Ready to Take Over

E-4Bs may not be operational for several reasons, including routine maintenance, technical failures, and even crisis deployments. Even if any of the four aircraft in the fleet are airworthy, authorities may choose not to use them for strategic reasons. In these cases, VVIPs can be transported on C-17 Globemaster IIIs.

Top: The E-4B Nightwatch. Bottom: The C-17 Globemaster III.

Aerospace company McDonnell Douglas originally designed the Boeing C-17 Globemaster III. It’s a rugged four-engine aircraft, but its interior isn’t ideal for VVIP transport. The cargo hold lacks connectivity and workstations. To address this issue, a system called the Silver Bullet is utilized, which makes the C-17 suitable for transporting high-ranking officials.

Military personnel are installing a Silver Bullet in a C-17 Globemaster III aircraft.

More from Xataka On

China Identifies a Strategic Advantage to Win the Aircraft Carrier Race Against the U.S.: A ‘Bubble’ in Its Defense

When the Silver Bullet option is activated, personnel from Air Mobility Command and the 89th Aerial Port Squadron install the Silver Bullet inside the C-17. This process involves moving the pod using a trailer and securing it in the aircraft’s cargo hold. Military personnel then connect a complex system of umbilical cables to ensure secure communication.

Left: Jens Stoltenberg is seen in a Silver Bullet. Right: Pete Hegseth is pictured inside another Silver Bullet.

Over the years, official images have offered glimpses into this ultra-secure aircraft. In 2017, then-NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg shared a photo of a meeting taking place inside the Silver Bullet. More recently, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared in a video posted on X from within one of these pods.

The space in the Silver Bullet is cramped but functional, featuring wood paneling, brown leather seats, secure phones and computers, a bathroom, and even a microwave. However, the Silver Bullet’s days are numbered. The Air Force plans to replace these pods, which were designed decades ago. Instead, it’ll use more advanced versions that will offer better connectivity, additional power outlets, sleeping quarters, and conference rooms that can accommodate up to nine people.

Image | U.S. Air Force Photo/Tech. Sgt. Robert Cloys [1, 2] | Public domain | Jens Stoltenberg| Wikimedia Commons

Related | U.S. Air Traffic Control Systems Are Outdated and Some Parts Are Impossible to Obtain, Report Says