Advertising Revenue on Elon Musk’s X Has Dropped Dramatically, So the Platform Decided to Sue a Group of Advertisers

  • The company has filed a lawsuit against GARM in a Texas federal court.

  • GARM is a consortium that represents brands responsible for 90% of global ad spending.

Elon Musk
No comments Twitter Flipboard E-mail
javier-marquez

Javier Márquez

Writer
  • Adapted by:

  • Alba Mora

javier-marquez

Javier Márquez

Writer

I've been in media for over a decade, but I've been marveling at the possibilities that technology brings us much longer. I believe we live in a world where the digital revolution is changing everything and that Xataka is the best place to write about it.

228 publications by Javier Márquez
alba-mora

Alba Mora

Writer

An established tech journalist, I entered the world of consumer tech by chance in 2018. In my writing and translating career, I've also covered a diverse range of topics, including entertainment, travel, science, and the economy.

1599 publications by Alba Mora

Elon Musk acquired Twitter (now X) almost two years ago. Since then, the social media platform has seen a significant decline in advertising revenue despite numerous promises and changes. In response to this, the company has taken legal action against several advertisers.

On Tuesday, the company filed a lawsuit against the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a coalition representing brands responsible for 90% of global advertising spending. The lawsuit, filed in a Texas federal court, alleges that the coalition “conspired” with companies such as Unilever, Mars, and Ørsted to “collectively withhold billions of dollars in advertising revenue from Twitter.”

Talks of an Advertising Boycott

The 44-page document mentions that after Musk acquired the platform for $44 billion, the coalition expressed concerns to its members about Twitter’s compliance with brand safety standards. In the lawsuit, X’s lawyers state that compliance with brand safety standards is a condition for membership in the coalition.

X claims that it’s always complied with the standards, but regulators have observed an increase in misinformation and hate speech on the platform, contradicting the company's claim. The lawsuit also mentions that at least eighteen advertisers left the social media platform, while many others reduced their advertising budgets by 70% or more following GARM’s stance.

X ads Ads on X.

In a public statement, X CEO Linda Yaccarino referenced a House of Representatives Judiciary Committee’s report that uncovered evidence of GARM and its members orchestrating boycotts to target platforms, content creators, and news organizations in an effort to deprive them of advertising revenue. X alleges that GARM has violated U.S. antitrust laws.

Considering X is now a privately held company, it’s not obligated to disclose its financial information to the public. Consequently, we don’t officially know the exact amount of money it’s earning. However, documents obtained by The New York Times suggest that the company’s revenue in the U.S was $114 million in the second quarter of 2024.

This indicates a 25% decrease from the first quarter of the year and a 53% decline compared to the same period last year. In contrast, in the second quarter of 2021, Twitter had reported revenues of $1.19 billion, with $1.05 billion coming from its advertising business. It’s clear that the company’s finances aren't in a good place.


Image | Ministério das Comunicações

Related | Elon Musk Is Suing OpenAI and Sam Altman Again: Microsoft’s Multibillion-Dollar Deal Is in the Spotlight

Comments closed
Home o Index