Ukraine

Russia can launch at least 2,000 drones per month year-round. Ukraine’s response is ingenious: balloons.

The exercise was more than just a drill. It proved that modern warfare has evolved, and that the UK is significantly behind the times.

In the context of a long war and strained supply lines, the loss of tens of thousands of tons of weaponry is a big concern for Russia.

The successful introduction of these drones marks a turning point in Ukraine’s technological warfare development.

The Banderol isn’t just a new Russian missile—it’s a physical embodiment of the technological, logistical, and diplomatic war unfolding behind the front lines.

As the war of attrition continues, each new battery deployed to the front lines will need to carry not only ammunition but also shovels for digging.

Russian naval power is no longer unchallenged, even against small boat drones capable of shooting down fighter jets dozens of miles off the coast.

The F-16 aircraft aren’t flyable. However, their value lies elsewhere. They’ll help other fighters to continue to be operational.

Moscow is preparing for a future where control of routes, troops, and deterrence capabilities will be the real bargaining chips in geopolitics.

North Korea’s military and human involvement in the Ukrainian war isn’t a simple gesture of support—it reconfigures power relations.

In the ongoing pursuit of efficiency, resilience, and technological superiority, Ukraine has introduced a novel approach to warfare: using viruses as weapons.

The damage presents a massive technical and financial dilemma for the international community. Is it time for authorities to undertake a massive new project, or will they risk a potential future catastrophe?